A+ rating on Better Business Bureau•Google reviews: 5.0•Martindale Hubbell Client Rating: 5.0•Lawyers.com Client Rating: 5.0•Avvo Client Rating: 5.0•Facebook Rating 5.0•Best Dog Bite Lawyers – Queens, NY (2025) (Expertise.com)•Best Bicycle Accident Lawyers – Queens, NY (2025) (Expertise.com)•Best Car Accident Lawyers – Middletown, NY (2025) (Expertise.com)•A+ rating on Better Business Bureau•Google reviews: 5.0•Martindale Hubbell Client Rating: 5.0•Lawyers.com Client Rating: 5.0•Avvo Client Rating: 5.0•Facebook Rating 5.0•Best Dog Bite Lawyers – Queens, NY (2025) (Expertise.com)•Best Bicycle Accident Lawyers – Queens, NY (2025) (Expertise.com)•Best Car Accident Lawyers – Middletown, NY (2025) (Expertise.com)

Crane Collapse Injuries Lawyer — University Heights, Bronx

Justice and Recovery

Personal Injury Claims for Crane Collapse Victims

If you or a loved one was injured in a crane collapse in University Heights, you need clear legal guidance and steady support while you focus on recovery. The Ahearne Law Firm PLLC in the Hudson Valley serves people across Bronx County and New York, offering hands-on attention to construction site injury claims. Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and the firm help clients understand their rights, preserve evidence, and pursue compensation for medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and other losses. Call (845) 986-2777 to discuss your situation and learn about next steps tailored to your case.

Crane collapse incidents often involve multiple parties including contractors, riggers, equipment manufacturers, and property owners, so determining responsibility can be complex and time sensitive. At Ahearne Law Firm PLLC we guide clients through the early investigative steps that matter most, including collecting witness statements, preserving photographs, and obtaining safety reports. We know that recovery takes time and that prompt action can protect important evidence. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical planning, and relentless attention to the details that affect your ability to obtain fair compensation and move forward after a traumatic event.

Protecting Your Recovery After a Crane Collapse

When a crane collapses the physical, financial, and emotional consequences can be overwhelming. Pursuing a personal injury claim helps injured parties secure funds for medical treatment, rehabilitation, lost wages, and ongoing care that may be required after severe trauma. Legal representation can also place pressure on liable parties and insurance carriers to take responsibility and provide fair compensation, rather than seeking to minimize or deny claims. By working methodically to build a strong case, clients are better positioned to obtain a settlement or court award that addresses immediate needs and future costs tied to the injury and related disruptions in daily life.

About Ahearne Law Firm and Allan J. Ahearne, Jr.

Ahearne Law Firm PLLC serves clients throughout the Hudson Valley and New York with focused attention to personal injury matters arising from construction accidents. Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. leads the office in delivering attentive client service, emphasizing direct communication, thorough case investigation, and careful preparation. The firm works to identify all potentially liable parties, gather documentation such as incident reports and medical records, and coordinate with engineers or other professionals as needed to explain how a collapse occurred. Clients receive practical guidance about timelines, expected costs, and how to secure evidence for a strong claim.

Understanding Crane Collapse Injury Claims

Crane collapse claims require a detailed assessment of negligence, equipment condition, maintenance records, and jobsite safety compliance. Liability can rest with a variety of entities, including contractors responsible for rigging, companies that maintained or inspected the crane, equipment manufacturers, and property owners. Investigators typically review operator logs, maintenance histories, training records, and OSHA or local inspection reports to determine whether safety standards were followed. A solid claim relies on timely collection of these materials and thoughtful analysis to show how lapses in planning, training, or maintenance led to injury or loss.

Because multiple parties may share responsibility, it is important to preserve evidence quickly and to speak with witnesses before memory fades. Insurance companies often begin early investigations and may pressure injured people to give recorded statements or accept quick settlements; having someone to advise you can prevent unintended concessions. Additionally, medical documentation must link injuries to the incident and explain future care needs. Understanding the sequence of events, the roles of involved parties, and the medical trajectory supports accurate valuation of damages and informs strategy whether pursuing settlement or litigation.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Negligence

Negligence refers to behavior or omissions that fall short of the care that a reasonably prudent person or company would exercise in similar circumstances, and it is often the basis for personal injury claims after a crane collapse. To prove negligence, a claimant must show that a duty of care existed, that the duty was breached through careless acts or omissions, and that the breach caused the injury and resulting damages. In construction cases this can include failure to follow safety protocols, inadequate training of operators, improper rigging, or poor maintenance of equipment. Demonstrating negligence typically relies on documentary evidence, witness testimony, and professional opinions that reconstruct the incident.

Third-Party Liability

Third-party liability describes situations where an entity other than the injured worker or their employer may be responsible for harm, and it is common in crane collapse incidents where subcontractors, equipment suppliers, or property owners played a role. Courts and insurers will examine contracts, oversight arrangements, and the specific actions that contributed to the accident to determine which entities can be held accountable. Establishing third-party liability often expands the pool of recovery for victims and requires careful review of agreements, maintenance logs, inspection records, and communications among companies at the worksite to show how third-party conduct caused or contributed to the collapse.

Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine that allocates responsibility when more than one party may have contributed to an accident, allowing damages to be reduced proportionally to an injured person’s share of fault. New York applies pure comparative negligence, meaning a plaintiff can recover damages even if they are partly at fault, but their award will be reduced by their percentage of responsibility. In crane collapse cases this can be relevant if multiple crews worked nearby or if a worker failed to follow a particular instruction. Accurate fault assessment requires detailed investigation, witness statements, and sometimes expert analysis to assign percentages that reflect each party’s role.

Damages

Damages are the monetary compensation a person seeks after an injury to cover losses such as medical treatment, rehabilitation, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and any permanent impairments. In crane collapse claims, damages can be substantial when injuries are severe, ongoing medical care is needed, or the incident leads to long-term disability. Calculating damages requires compiling medical bills, wage statements, and evidence of everyday impacts on quality of life. Proper documentation and clear presentation of expected future costs help support a fair valuation during settlement discussions or at trial.

PRO TIPS

Document Every Detail

After a crane collapse, start documenting everything you can about the scene, your injuries, and any communication from supervisors or insurers. Take photographs of the site, equipment, and visible injuries, make notes about times and witness names, and keep copies of all medical records and bills related to treatment. Timely and thorough documentation strengthens your ability to establish what happened and to show how the event affected your health, finances, and daily life when you later pursue a claim or negotiate with insurers.

Preserve Physical Evidence

Preserving physical evidence such as damaged rigging, safety logs, operator checklists, and maintenance records is essential for proving what caused a crane collapse. Notify your employer or the site manager that evidence should be preserved, and keep your own copies of documents, photos, and messages. Avoid altering or disposing of anything that could be relevant, and share the preserved materials with your legal representative so they can be reviewed by engineers or other professionals who may help explain the collapse.

Avoid Early Settlements

Insurance companies may offer quick settlements that seem convenient but often fail to cover long-term medical costs and other damages related to a crane collapse. Before accepting any offer, make sure you understand the full extent of your injuries, the likely course of recovery, and future care needs that may not be apparent right away. Consulting with counsel can help you evaluate whether a proposed settlement is reasonable given your expected expenses and lifestyle impacts, and it reduces the risk of agreeing to terms that leave you undercompensated.

Comparing Legal Options After a Crane Collapse

When Full Representation Makes Sense:

Severe Injuries or Fatalities

Comprehensive representation is often necessary when injuries are severe, permanent, or fatal and the claim requires careful quantification of long-term medical care, lost earning capacity, and other significant losses. Cases with catastrophic outcomes typically involve multiple sources of liability and complex evidence such as maintenance histories and engineering reports, which require coordinated investigation and professional consultation. In such circumstances, a full-service approach helps ensure all responsible parties are identified and that the claim seeks compensation sufficient to address future as well as present needs.

Complex Liability Across Parties

When multiple contractors, subcontractors, equipment suppliers, or property owners may share responsibility, a comprehensive strategy is typically necessary to sort out legal and contractual relationships and to pursue claims against all liable parties. This often involves obtaining and reviewing contracts, maintenance records, inspection reports, and internal communications to trace fault and demonstrate how decisions or omissions contributed to the collapse. A methodical approach ensures that potential avenues of recovery are not overlooked and that claims are pursued in the right order and in the appropriate forums.

When a Limited Approach May Be Adequate:

Minor Injuries and Clear Fault

A more limited, focused approach may be appropriate when injuries are relatively minor, fault is clearly established, and the damages are modest, allowing for a quicker resolution through negotiation with the responsible insurer. In these situations, concentrating on immediate medical documentation and a concise presentation of losses can lead to a fair settlement without prolonged investigation or litigation. Still, even straightforward claims benefit from careful documentation and advice to ensure that any settlement fully reflects medical needs and economic losses.

Quick, Low-Value Claims

When the expected recovery is small and the facts plainly favor the injured party, a limited approach focused on efficient negotiation may be preferable to an extensive legal campaign. This path emphasizes collecting clear medical records, billing statements, and a short factual summary to present to the insurer while avoiding unnecessary expense and delay. Clients choosing this route should still be cautious about releases and ensure any agreement adequately compensates them for both immediate treatment and any short-term impacts on work or daily activities.

Common Circumstances Leading to Crane Collapses

Improper Rigging

Improper rigging occurs when load calculations are incorrect, slings or shackles are misused, or rigging hardware is not rated for the load, all of which can lead to catastrophic failure when stress exceeds capacity. Investigations often focus on training records, jobsite supervision, and the condition of rigging gear to determine whether mistakes or shortcuts contributed to the collapse and to identify the parties responsible for those decisions.

Mechanical Failure

Mechanical failure can arise from inadequate maintenance, worn components, or defective parts, and it frequently requires review of service logs, inspection reports, and manufacturer guidance to establish how a malfunction occurred. Determining whether maintenance schedules were followed and whether known defects were reported helps establish whether a company or manufacturer bears responsibility for the collapse.

Operator Error

Operator error can include miscommunication, failure to follow load charts, or improper signaling and often requires analysis of training, supervision, and on-site conditions to determine why the error occurred. Understanding the context of operator decisions, including pressure to meet deadlines or conflicting instructions, helps clarify whether fault rests with the individual operator, their employer, or other parties who influenced operations.

University Heights Crane Collapse Lawyer

Why Hire Ahearne Law Firm for Crane Collapse Claims

Ahearne Law Firm PLLC focuses on delivering personalized attention to people injured in construction site accidents throughout the Hudson Valley and New York. Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and the firm prioritize open communication, careful case preparation, and aggressive pursuit of all available sources of compensation. Clients receive clear explanations of legal options, practical guidance about evidence preservation, and ongoing updates as a claim develops. The firm handles negotiations with insurers and coordinates necessary investigations so clients can concentrate on medical recovery and family needs while their case moves forward.

Clients appreciate the practical, client-centered approach that combines timely responsiveness with careful planning, including investigation of site records and coordination with engineers when technical analysis is required. The firm reviews potential liability across contractors, suppliers, and owners to maximize recovery opportunities, while explaining likely timelines and considerations for settlement versus litigation. For convenience, the office can be reached at (845) 986-2777, and initial consultations review the facts, available evidence, and procedural next steps so clients can make informed decisions about pursuing a claim.

Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation

People Also Search For

crane collapse lawyer University Heights

crane accident attorney Bronx

construction accident lawyer Hudson Valley

crane collapse injury claim New York

construction site negligence attorney

workplace crane collapse injury

personal injury crane collapse lawyer

Allan J. Ahearne crane lawyer

FAQS

What should I do immediately after a crane collapse injury?

After a crane collapse, your first priority should be seeking medical attention for yourself and anyone else who is injured, even if symptoms seem mild at first. Prompt medical documentation is essential both for health and for any later claim, and it helps create a clear causal link between the incident and injuries. At the scene, if it is safe, try to photograph the conditions, take down names of witnesses, and preserve clothing or personal items that show damage. Sharing those details later with counsel or investigators supports a thorough reconstruction of the event. You should also avoid giving recorded statements to insurers or signing any documents without legal review, since early statements can be used to minimize claims. Notify your employer as required, keep copies of medical records and bills, and write down your own account of what happened while memories are fresh. Contacting legal counsel can help prioritize next steps, including preservation letters to key parties and guidance about communications with insurers and employers.

Who can be held liable after a crane collapse?

Liability in a crane collapse can fall on several parties depending on the facts, including the crane operator, the operator’s employer, the general contractor, subcontractors responsible for rigging, equipment maintenance companies, and manufacturers of defective parts. The investigation focuses on who performed work, who controlled the site, and whether safety protocols and maintenance obligations were followed. Contracts, work orders, inspection reports, and training records often reveal where responsibility lies and which entities had duties to prevent the collapse. Determining liability may require technical analysis by engineers and review of inspection and maintenance histories to show that a breach of duty caused the collapse. Once potential defendants are identified, claims can be pursued against all responsible parties to maximize recovery. Properly identifying liable parties early helps preserve evidence and streamline the process of seeking compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other harms.

How long do I have to file a claim for a crane collapse injury in New York?

In New York, most personal injury claims are governed by a statute of limitations, which typically requires filing a lawsuit within three years from the date of the injury. There can be important exceptions or shorter deadlines for claims against public entities, municipalities, or when particular contract terms apply, so it is important to seek timely legal advice to protect your rights. Failing to file within the applicable deadline can bar recovery even if liability is clear. Because statutes of limitations can vary based on who is sued and the precise legal theory, it is prudent to act quickly to gather evidence and consult counsel. Even if you are still undergoing treatment, initiating an inquiry or preserving your claim ensures that you do not inadvertently lose the right to pursue compensation while you focus on recovery and medical care.

Will my workers' compensation claim prevent a personal injury lawsuit?

Workers’ compensation typically provides benefits for employees injured on the job, covering medical treatment and partial wage replacement regardless of fault, but it does not always prevent a separate personal injury claim against third parties whose negligence caused the injury. When an outside party such as a contractor, equipment supplier, or property owner is responsible, injured workers may pursue a third-party personal injury claim in addition to workers’ compensation benefits. Recoveries from third parties can supplement workers’ compensation and compensate for pain and suffering, which workers’ compensation does not cover. Coordinating workers’ compensation and third-party claims requires careful handling to avoid conflicts and to ensure proper allocation of any recovery. Communication between your representatives and insurers can identify subrogation interests and set expectations about how recoveries will be distributed, while preserving your ability to seek full compensation from those responsible beyond the employer’s insurance.

How are damages calculated in a crane collapse case?

Damages in a crane collapse case include economic losses such as medical bills, rehabilitation expenses, and lost wages, and non-economic losses such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, and diminished quality of life. When injuries result in long-term impairment, future medical expenses and reduced earning capacity are also considered. The total value of a claim depends on the severity of injuries, prognosis, documentation of expenses, and the impact on daily activities and employment. To calculate damages accurately, medical records, billing statements, wage documentation, and testimony about the accident’s impact on life are compiled and presented. In complex cases, vocational assessments and expert evaluations may help quantify future losses and support enhanced recovery for ongoing care and diminished earning ability.

Should I speak to the insurance company after an accident?

It is common to hear from insurance adjusters soon after an accident, and while they may seem helpful their primary role is to protect their insured’s interests. You should provide accurate information but avoid giving detailed recorded statements or signing releases without legal review. Early conversations can inadvertently limit your options later if statements are taken out of context or if you accept a low settlement before the full extent of injuries is known. Before discussing the case at length with insurers, document medical care and speak with counsel who can advise on appropriate communications and steps to protect evidence. If you do speak with an adjuster, keep your comments factual and brief, and consult an attorney about how to proceed to avoid undermining your claim.

What types of evidence are most important in these cases?

Important evidence in crane collapse cases includes incident and inspection reports, maintenance and service records for the equipment, operator logs, employee training documentation, photos and videos of the scene, and witness statements. Physical evidence such as damaged rigging, failed components, or safety devices can also be crucial, and preserving these items often requires notifying relevant parties and requesting they refrain from altering or disposing of materials. Medical records that document injuries and their progression are equally important to link harm to the incident. Timely preservation and collection of these materials strengthen your position when negotiating with insurers or presenting a case in court. Coordination with investigators, engineers, and medical professionals helps to interpret the evidence, explain causation, and demonstrate how failures in maintenance, training, or oversight led to the collapse and resulting injuries.

Can family members bring a wrongful death claim after a fatal collapse?

Yes, family members may bring a wrongful death claim when a crane collapse results in a fatality, seeking compensation for funeral expenses, loss of support, and the emotional and economic consequences of the death. Wrongful death actions are governed by specific statutes and time limits in New York, and eligible relatives are typically limited to certain beneficiaries such as spouses, children, or dependent family members. These claims require careful documentation of losses and the causal link between the collapse and the death. Because wrongful death cases involve both legal and emotional complexities, early preservation of evidence and quick consultation help ensure that claims are filed in a timely manner and that recoverable damages are properly identified. Coordination with medical and investigative professionals is important to establish cause and liability while providing family members with clear information about next steps and available remedies.

What if the responsible party denies fault?

If a responsible party denies fault, the process shifts to gathering stronger evidence to prove causation and responsibility, including witness testimony, inspection logs, maintenance records, and expert analysis when needed. Many cases are resolved through negotiation after evidence is developed and liability becomes clearer, but some require litigation to compel discovery and present the facts to a judge or jury. Denials are common, and they make early investigation and documentation especially important. Your legal team can serve as an intermediary to request documents, depose witnesses, and retain professionals to analyze the collapse and explain the causes. This methodical approach increases the likelihood of resolving disputes favorably, whether through settlement or courtroom decision, by assembling a persuasive factual record that supports your claim.

How long will it take to resolve my crane collapse injury case?

The time to resolve a crane collapse injury case varies based on factors such as the severity of injuries, complexity of liability, the number of defendants, and the willingness of insurers to negotiate. Some claims settle within months when responsibility is clear and injuries are well documented, while more complicated cases involving multiple parties or catastrophic injuries can take a year or longer and may proceed to trial. Medical treatment timelines also influence when a fair settlement can be evaluated, because the full extent of future needs often becomes clearer after initial recovery. While duration cannot be guaranteed, engaging counsel early helps to expedite evidence preservation, streamline discovery, and pursue timely negotiations. Regular communication about case status and realistic timelines allows clients to plan for recovery and financial needs while their claim progresses toward resolution.

Personal Injury Services in University Heights

Explore our injury practice areas

⚖️ All Personal Injury Services