If you were injured on a construction site in East Amherst, you may be facing medical bills, lost income, and uncertainty about what steps to take next. Ahearne Law Firm PLLC represents people injured in construction accidents throughout the Hudson Valley and New York, and attorney Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. can work with you to identify potential avenues for recovery under New York law. This page explains common causes of construction site injuries, the differences between workers’ compensation and other claims, and practical next steps to protect your rights. Contacting the firm promptly can help preserve evidence and support a timely response to insurance companies and other parties.
Engaging a law firm after a construction injury helps ensure your claim is developed thoroughly and presented clearly to insurers, employers, and other potentially responsible parties. The firm can assist with gathering and preserving evidence including incident reports, medical records, witness statements, and site documentation that may be difficult to recreate later. Having someone manage communications with insurance adjusters can reduce pressure to accept an early low settlement and help you understand what types of recovery may be available for medical costs, lost wages, and related damages. Careful claim preparation also helps identify all possible responsible parties and coordinate multiple claims when necessary.
A third-party claim arises when someone other than your employer may be legally responsible for an injury you suffered at a construction site. Examples include claims against equipment manufacturers for defective machinery, contractors who fail to secure a work area, or property owners who neglected known hazards. Pursuing a third-party claim is separate from workers’ compensation benefits and may allow recovery for losses that workers’ compensation does not fully cover. Establishing a third-party claim typically requires showing that the other party owed a duty of care, breached that duty through negligent actions or omissions, and caused the injury and resulting damages.
Workers’ compensation provides a no-fault system through which many injured workers receive benefits for medical treatment and partial wage replacement after a workplace injury. While it generally covers work-related injuries without proving employer negligence, it may not compensate for pain and suffering. Under certain circumstances, an injured worker may pursue a separate claim against a third party in addition to workers’ compensation, depending on the facts and applicable law. Understanding how workers’ compensation interacts with other potential claims helps determine the full range of recovery options available following a construction site incident in New York.
Negligence is a legal concept used to determine liability when someone fails to act with reasonable care and that failure causes harm to another person. In a construction site context, negligence can include failures to follow safety protocols, inadequate training, poor site supervision, or improper maintenance of equipment. To establish negligence in a claim, it is generally necessary to show that the responsible party owed a duty, breached that duty through action or inaction, and that breach directly caused the injury and resulting damages. Evidence such as safety logs, witness statements, and maintenance records can be important in proving negligence.
The statute of limitations is the legal deadline for filing a claim in court, and it varies depending on the type of claim and the jurisdiction. In New York, common law personal injury claims typically must be filed within a set period from the date of injury, and missing that deadline may prevent you from pursuing damages in court. Different deadlines may apply for workers’ compensation filings, administrative claims, or actions against government entities. Because these time limits differ and can be affected by specific circumstances, it is important to identify applicable deadlines early and take steps to protect your rights within those timeframes.
Seek medical attention as soon as possible after a construction site injury, even if injuries initially seem minor. Timely medical documentation creates an important record linking the injury to the incident and supports treatment continuity that insurers and claim evaluators will review. Keeping copies of all medical records, test results, and referrals helps present a complete picture of your recovery needs and associated costs when assembling a claim or communicating with insurance companies.
Preserve any physical or documentary evidence from the incident by taking photos, saving damaged clothing, and securing contact information for witnesses while details are fresh. If possible, document site conditions, equipment involved, signage, and any safety measures or lack thereof at the scene. Early preservation of evidence helps reconstruct the event later and can be essential for showing what happened and who may bear responsibility for the injury.
Keep a record of all communications related to the injury, including emails, text messages, and written correspondence with employers, site supervisors, and insurance representatives. Note dates, times, and summaries of phone conversations and meetings to create a clear timeline of events and responses. Well-organized documentation of communications can help clarify statements, identify inconsistencies, and support your position during claim negotiations or other proceedings.
A comprehensive approach to a construction injury claim is often appropriate when injuries are serious, long-lasting, or require ongoing medical care and rehabilitation. Complex medical needs, potential long-term wage loss, and the need to coordinate multiple sources of benefits can make thorough investigation and careful planning important. In such cases, assembling detailed medical evidence, vocational assessments, and economic loss documentation helps ensure that all present and future losses are considered when pursuing recovery on behalf of an injured person.
When several parties may share responsibility for a construction site injury, a comprehensive approach helps identify all potential defendants and coordinate claims to maximize recovery. Multiple liable parties can include contractors, subcontractors, equipment owners, or product manufacturers. Investigating contracts, site supervision records, and equipment maintenance histories can reveal avenues for recovery that may not be apparent from initial reports and can support a coordinated strategy for addressing overlapping claims.
A more limited approach may be appropriate when injuries are relatively minor, liability is clear, and the damages are straightforward to document. In such situations it can be reasonable to pursue a direct insurance claim or a workers’ compensation benefit without extensive investigation. Even when pursuing a more limited path, maintaining careful records of treatment and expenses helps ensure a claim is properly evaluated and resolved in a timely way.
If an insurer offers a prompt and fair resolution that reasonably covers medical costs and lost earnings, a limited approach focused on negotiation may be appropriate. Proceeding in this manner can reduce time and expense when the facts are straightforward and recovery needs are well-supported by documentation. It remains important to consider future medical needs and to document treatment thoroughly before accepting any settlement or finalizing benefits.
Falls from scaffolding, ladders, roofs, or elevated platforms are among the most frequent causes of serious construction injuries and often result in broken bones, head trauma, or spinal injuries. Clear documentation of the fall location, fall protection measures, and witness accounts can be essential in determining responsibility and pursuing compensation for medical care and recovery-related losses.
Being struck by falling tools, building materials, or moving equipment can cause significant injuries that require medical treatment and may lead to time away from work. Photographs of the scene, maintenance records for equipment, and witness statements can help show how the incident occurred and whether negligent practices contributed to the event.
Electrical contact, arc flashes, and thermal burns present serious health risks and may require specialized medical care and rehabilitation, depending on severity. Identifying the source of electricity, compliance with safety protocols, and inspection or maintenance histories can assist in determining what led to the injury and who may be responsible for associated damages.
Ahearne Law Firm PLLC focuses on helping people navigate the practical and procedural challenges that follow a construction site injury in New York. The firm assists with gathering relevant records, communicating with insurers, and identifying possible avenues for compensation while keeping clients informed about next steps. Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and the team aim to provide clear information about options like workers’ compensation and third-party claims so that injured individuals can make informed decisions about how to pursue recovery based on the facts of their case.
Seek medical attention right away and follow any recommended treatment plans, as timely medical documentation is essential to establishing the connection between the incident and your injuries. Report the incident to your employer or site supervisor, gather contact information for any witnesses, and take photographs of the scene and any equipment involved if it is safe to do so. Preserving evidence and creating a contemporaneous record of the event can make a significant difference later when claims are evaluated. After addressing immediate health needs and preserving evidence, consider contacting Ahearne Law Firm PLLC to discuss the facts and potential avenues for recovery. A preliminary review can clarify whether workers’ compensation, a third-party claim, or both may be appropriate, and can help you understand filing deadlines and documentation that will support your claim. Keeping a detailed log of symptoms, treatment, and missed work also helps quantify losses for any claim.
In many cases, workers’ compensation is the primary method for obtaining medical benefits and wage replacement after a workplace injury, and it typically applies regardless of fault. Suing your employer directly for pain and suffering is often restricted by workers’ compensation rules, but there are circumstances where a separate claim may be possible, such as when a third party other than your employer contributed to the injury or when statutory exceptions apply. Determining whether you can bring a civil action in addition to or instead of workers’ compensation depends on the facts of your incident and applicable New York law. A review of the specific circumstances, including contracts, site roles, and the involvement of third parties, helps identify potential legal avenues and whether pursuing a lawsuit outside the workers’ compensation system is available and advisable.
Deadline rules vary depending on the type of claim you pursue. For many personal injury claims in New York, the statute of limitations requires filing a lawsuit within a set period from the date of injury, and waiting past that deadline can bar recovery in court. Workers’ compensation claims and administrative actions may have different filing timelines and procedural steps that must be followed to preserve benefits. Because different deadlines can apply to different types of claims and certain exceptions may affect timing, it is important to identify applicable time limits early. Contacting a firm promptly helps ensure necessary filings are completed on time, that preserves rights to any potential recovery and supports collection of evidence while it remains available.
Possible recoveries after a construction site injury commonly include payment of medical bills and coverage for reasonable and necessary treatment, reimbursement for lost wages or loss of earning capacity, and compensation for related out-of-pocket expenses. In personal injury actions outside the workers’ compensation system, damages for pain and suffering or other non-economic losses may also be available depending on the claim and the responsible parties involved. The types and amounts of recovery depend on the nature and severity of the injuries, the strength of the evidence, and the legal avenues pursued. A careful accounting of medical records, wage documentation, and future care projections helps present a clear picture of economic losses and supports discussions with insurers or other parties about fair compensation.
Many law firms that handle personal injury matters, including construction injury claims, discuss fee arrangements during the initial consultation and may work on a contingency fee basis where fees are collected only if recovery is obtained. This structure can reduce immediate financial barriers to pursuing claims because legal fees and costs are typically tied to the outcome of the case rather than paid upfront. That said, specific arrangements vary between firms and by the nature of the case, so it is important to discuss fee structures, potential out-of-pocket costs, and billing practices at the outset. Clear communication about fees and expected costs helps you make an informed decision about moving forward with a claim.
If you were partially at fault for your injury, New York follows a comparative fault approach that reduces recoverable damages in proportion to assigned fault rather than barring recovery entirely under most personal injury claims. Under this approach, the amount of compensation you may recover is decreased by the percentage of fault attributed to you, so documentation that clarifies the extent of others’ responsibility can make a meaningful difference in the net recovery. In workers’ compensation claims, fault is generally not a factor in eligibility for benefits, though other procedural requirements may apply. Understanding how comparative fault and other doctrines apply to the specific facts of your case helps evaluate likely outcomes and inform decisions about negotiation versus further action.
A third-party claim allows an injured worker to pursue a party other than the employer when that party’s negligence or wrongdoing contributed to the injury, such as a subcontractor, equipment manufacturer, or property owner. Third-party claims are pursued separately from workers’ compensation, and recoveries from third parties may address losses that are not fully covered through the workers’ compensation system alone. Coordinating workers’ compensation benefits with third-party recovery often requires careful handling to account for any liens or subrogation rights that the workers’ compensation carrier may assert. Identifying potential third-party defendants and collecting relevant evidence early helps preserve the ability to pursue these claims while also managing interactions with compensation carriers.
Many construction injury matters are resolved through negotiation and settlement without proceeding to trial, particularly when liability and damages can be documented and a fair resolution is within reach. Settlement allows parties to resolve matters more quickly and avoid the time and expense associated with litigation, though whether settlement is appropriate depends on the facts, the strength of the evidence, and the offer on the table. If a fair resolution cannot be reached through discussions, litigation may be necessary to pursue full recovery, and the case could proceed through the court system. Preparing for litigation involves thorough investigation, discovery, and possible expert testimony depending on the issues, and a careful evaluation of potential outcomes helps inform whether to accept an offer or move forward to trial.
Fault on a construction site is determined by examining the actions and responsibilities of those involved, including adherence to safety protocols, equipment maintenance, site supervision, and regulatory compliance. Evidence such as incident reports, safety meeting minutes, maintenance logs, photographs of the scene, and witness statements are used to reconstruct the event and identify lapses that may have contributed to the injury. Investigators and claim handlers look for whether a party owed a duty of care, whether that duty was breached, and whether the breach caused the injury. Contract roles and statutory obligations can also affect how responsibility is allocated, so understanding the relationships among contractors, subcontractors, and site owners is an important part of determining fault.
The timeline for resolving a construction injury claim varies widely based on the case complexity, the severity of injuries, the clarity of liability, and whether the matter settles or proceeds to litigation. Some claims can be resolved within a few months if liability is clear and medical treatment is complete, while others involving long-term care, disputed liability, or multiple defendants can take significantly longer as investigations and negotiations develop. Factors such as the need for additional medical documentation, depositions, expert evaluations, and court scheduling influence the duration of a case. Discussing the specific circumstances of your situation with the firm helps set realistic expectations about likely timelines and the steps needed to move a claim forward as efficiently as possible.
Explore our injury practice areas
⚖️ All Personal Injury Services