If you were injured in a motor vehicle accident in Great Neck Plaza or elsewhere in Nassau County, you face medical care, insurance negotiations, repair bills and uncertainty about how to move forward. This guide explains what to expect from the claims process, what steps help protect your rights, and how Ahearne Law Firm PLLC and Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. can assist. We serve clients throughout the Hudson Valley and New York, helping people collect documentation, preserve evidence, and communicate with insurers. Call (845) 986-2777 to discuss your situation and learn the practical options available to pursue fair recovery.
Acting promptly after a motor vehicle accident preserves evidence, strengthens the credibility of your claim, and increases the likelihood of a fair settlement. Early medical evaluation documents injuries that may not be immediately apparent and creates a clear record linking treatment to the collision. Timely notice to insurers and preservation of photos, witness information and repair estimates reduces disputes about liability and damages. A focused approach to documentation and communication often leads to faster resolutions and fewer obstacles, allowing injured people to prioritize recovery while trusted counsel handles negotiations, filings and communications with insurers.
Negligence is the legal concept that someone failed to act with the care a reasonable person would use, and that failure caused harm. In a motor vehicle context, negligence might include speeding, running a red light, failing to yield, distracted driving or other careless conduct. To recover compensation, an injured person typically must show that the other party owed a duty of care, breached that duty through careless conduct, and that breach directly caused injuries and losses. Evidence such as photos, witness statements and police reports supports a negligence claim by showing how the collision happened and who acted carelessly.
Comparative fault refers to New York’s approach to dividing responsibility when more than one person contributed to an accident. Under comparative fault principles, a jury or judge may determine that each party bears a percentage of responsibility for the crash, and any monetary recovery will be reduced by the injured person’s percentage of fault. For example, if a claimant is found 20 percent at fault, the recovery amount is reduced by that percentage. Understanding how comparative fault applies is important for evaluating settlement offers and deciding whether to pursue litigation to reach a fair result.
Liability in a motor vehicle accident refers to the legal responsibility for causing the crash and the resulting damages. Determining liability involves assessing who owed a duty of care, whether that duty was breached and how that breach caused the collision. Liability can rest with a driver, a vehicle owner, a maintenance provider, or another party depending on the circumstances. Establishing liability requires collecting objective evidence such as traffic camera footage, photographs, skid marks, witness accounts and official reports to show how and why the accident occurred.
Damages are the losses a person suffers because of an accident and may include medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, and compensation for pain and suffering. In New York, damages aim to put the injured person in a position similar to where they would have been without the injury. Economic damages cover verifiable costs like hospital bills and repair invoices, while non-economic damages address more subjective harms such as physical pain, mental anguish and diminished quality of life. Accurate documentation of expenses and the impact of injuries supports a complete claim for damages.
Photographs and notes taken at the scene provide powerful support for your claim, so capture vehicle positions, damage, road conditions, traffic signs and any visible injuries as soon as possible. Obtain contact information for witnesses and the other driver, and keep a detailed record of conversations with insurers or repair shops to avoid misunderstandings later. These steps make it easier to reconstruct the accident and respond to insurance requests, helping preserve vital evidence while you focus on medical care and recovery.
Timely medical evaluation not only protects your health but also creates an objective record that links treatment to the crash, which insurers frequently review when assessing claims. Even if injuries seem minor at first, symptoms can emerge later, so follow through with recommended testing and therapy and keep copies of all medical records and bills. Clear, contemporaneous medical documentation strengthens the ability to recover compensation for treatment costs, ongoing care and related losses by showing a consistent treatment timeline connected to the accident.
Do not sign release forms or accept an early settlement without reviewing the full extent of your injuries and consulting with counsel, because initial offers may not cover future medical needs or long-term effects of the injury. Keep detailed records of wage loss, repair invoices, rental car expenses and other out-of-pocket costs to ensure settlement conversations reflect the true scope of your losses. If an insurer requests a recorded statement, consider seeking advice first to understand how your words may be used in the evaluation of your claim.
Serious injuries that require ongoing treatment, surgery or long-term rehabilitation often involve complex damage calculations and interactions with multiple healthcare providers and insurers, which benefits from a coordinated approach to documentation and negotiation. When losses include future medical needs, diminished earning capacity or permanent impairment, a broad review of evidence and careful valuation strategies are necessary to seek adequate recovery. Having a consistent advocate manage medical records, expert opinions and settlement strategy helps ensure the full scope of current and future damages is considered.
Accidents involving multiple vehicles, commercial drivers, or third-party negligence create complicated liability questions that require thorough investigation and coordination of evidence from several sources to determine responsibility. Disputes about fault or scenarios with conflicting witness accounts often call for reconstruction evidence, witness interviews and careful review of police and maintenance records. A comprehensive approach can reduce the risk of overlooked claims against responsible parties and improve the likelihood of an outcome that accounts for all viable avenues of recovery.
If the incident involves primarily vehicle damage with little or no personal injury, a focused approach that documents repairs, obtains estimates and negotiates with insurers can resolve the matter without prolonged action. For clear-cut property damage claims, gathering photos, repair invoices and a police report is often enough to secure reimbursement. That limited path may be appropriate when medical issues are absent and liability is not in dispute.
Cases with easily established fault and minor medical treatment can sometimes be resolved through direct negotiation with the at-fault insurer, using medical bills and wage loss documentation to support a settlement demand. This narrower strategy can save time when the full extent of harm is known and does not require future care. Still, preserving medical records and being cautious about early releases remains important to avoid under-compensation later.
Rear-end collisions often produce soft-tissue injuries and transfer of force that may not be obvious immediately, so timely medical evaluation and detailed documentation of symptoms and treatment are essential. Photographs of vehicle damage, dashcam footage and witness statements help establish the dynamics of the impact and support compensation for medical care and repair costs.
Intersection crashes frequently involve conflicting witness accounts and traffic signal issues, requiring careful reconstruction of the scene and review of police reports to identify fault. Securing traffic camera footage, witness contact information and physical evidence is important to demonstrate how the collision occurred and to allocate responsibility accurately.
Injuries to pedestrians and cyclists can be severe even at low speeds, and the public nature of many incidents makes witness and surveillance evidence especially valuable for claims. Prompt medical documentation and careful preservation of scene evidence strengthen the ability to seek compensation for medical care, rehabilitation and other losses related to non-occupant accidents.
Ahearne Law Firm PLLC provides personal injury representation tailored to the needs of individuals injured in motor vehicle accidents throughout Great Neck Plaza and the surrounding Hudson Valley. Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and the team focus on securing fair results through thorough evidence gathering, clear communication with medical providers and insurers, and careful preparation for negotiations or court if needed. We emphasize practical solutions that aim to cover medical care, lost income and other accident-related losses while minimizing added stress for clients during recovery.
Immediately after a collision, ensure safety first: move to a safe location when possible, check for injuries and call emergency services if anyone needs urgent care. Exchange contact, insurance and vehicle information with the other driver, and if there are witnesses, collect their names and contact details. Photograph the scene, vehicle damage, skid marks and relevant road signs or signals as soon as it is safe to do so. Report the accident to your insurance company and seek medical attention even if injuries seem minor, because symptoms can appear later and medical records are critical evidence. Keep a thorough record of all medical visits, treatments, prescriptions and related expenses, along with notes about pain levels and how injuries affect daily activities. Preserve any repair estimates or rental car invoices, and document missed work and income loss. Before agreeing to sign release documents or accepting an insurer’s first settlement offer, consider discussing the case with counsel to ensure you understand the value of your claim and avoid waiving rights before future medical needs are known.
New York’s time limits, known as statutes of limitations, establish deadlines to file a personal injury lawsuit after a motor vehicle accident, and those deadlines vary depending on the claim and parties involved. For most personal injury claims against another motorist, the usual time limit is two years from the date of the accident to commence a lawsuit. Failing to file within that period can bar a court claim even if liability is clear, which makes timely review and action important once you know the scope of injuries and anticipated losses. There are exceptions and additional deadlines for claims involving municipalities or government entities, which often require giving notice within shorter time frames before a suit can be filed. Because specific circumstances can affect deadlines, it’s important to consult promptly so that any necessary notices, preservation steps or filings occur within the applicable time limits and do not jeopardize potential recovery.
Many motor vehicle accident cases are resolved through negotiation and settlement with insurers rather than through trial, particularly when liability is clear and the damages are well documented. Insurers may offer settlements early in the process, but those initial offers may not fully account for future medical needs or non-economic harms, so careful evaluation of the claim’s full value is important before accepting any proposal. Settlement allows parties to avoid the time, expense and uncertainty of litigation when a fair resolution can be achieved outside court. However, some claims require filing a lawsuit to pursue fair compensation, especially when there are disputes about fault, significant or ongoing medical needs, or uncooperative insurers. If litigation becomes necessary, your case will progress through discovery and pretrial steps and may settle at any time before trial. Preparing thoroughly for the possibility of trial often improves settlement outcomes, because it demonstrates readiness to pursue the claim to completion if needed.
Fault is determined by examining the facts of the collision to identify who acted negligently and how that conduct caused the crash. Relevant evidence includes the police report, witness statements, photographs of the scene and vehicles, traffic signals, skid marks and any available video footage. Medical records, vehicle damage patterns and reconstruction analysis can also clarify the sequence of events and responsibility for the accident. In New York, courts apply comparative fault rules to divide responsibility when multiple parties share blame, and any recovery is adjusted by the injured person’s percentage of fault. Insurance investigators and attorneys will analyze the evidence to build a liability theory, and if there is a dispute, the matter may be decided through negotiations, mediation, or by a judge or jury during trial.
Recoverable damages in a motor vehicle accident case commonly include economic losses such as medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, prescription expenses, property damage and lost wages for time missed at work. If future medical care or loss of earning capacity is expected, claims can include those projected costs with supporting documentation and expert opinions where appropriate. Non-economic damages may include compensation for physical pain, mental suffering and loss of enjoyment of life when injuries impact daily activities or relationships. In some cases, punitive damages may be pursued if the at-fault party’s conduct was particularly reckless, though those awards are less common and depend on the specifics of the behavior and governing law. A full assessment of damages requires gathering medical records, bills, employment records and other evidence to present a comprehensive claim for both present and future losses arising from the accident.
Many personal injury lawyers, including those handling motor vehicle accidents, operate on a contingency fee basis, which means the attorney’s fee is a percentage of the recovery obtained through settlement or judgment and there is no upfront hourly charge in most cases. Contingency arrangements align the lawyer’s interests with the client’s recovery and make representation accessible to people who cannot pay hourly fees. Clients should ask about the fee percentage, how costs and expenses are handled and whether any fees are due if there is no recovery. In addition to contingency fees, clients may be responsible for case expenses such as court filing fees, expert reports or investigation costs, depending on the arrangement. A transparent discussion at the outset clarifies what to expect, how costs will be handled, and the circumstances under which expenses might be reimbursed from a recovery. Always request written terms describing fees and costs before proceeding.
New York follows a comparative fault rule, which means an injured person can still recover compensation even if they share some responsibility for the accident, but the recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if a claimant is found 30 percent responsible, any award will be reduced by that percentage. This system allows recovery in many cases where both parties bear some responsibility, but it makes accurate fault assessment important for understanding potential damages. Proving how much each party contributed to the collision depends on evidence such as witness accounts, police reports, vehicle damage and other objective indicators. Skilled claim preparation seeks to minimize the claimant’s assigned fault by presenting a clear timeline, documentation and supporting evidence that demonstrates the other party’s actions leading to the crash.
If the at-fault driver lacks insurance or has insufficient coverage, other options may include filing a claim under your own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage if your policy includes that protection. UM/UIM coverage is designed to cover medical bills and other losses when the responsible driver cannot pay, and the claims process will involve proving the extent of your damages and the lack of adequate coverage from the at-fault party. In some situations, alternative sources of recovery may exist, such as claims against a vehicle owner, an employer if the at-fault driver was working at the time, or a third party with liability. Evaluating the available insurance limits and potential defendants early helps determine the appropriate path for pursuing full compensation despite an uninsured or underinsured at-fault motorist.
The timeline to resolve a motor vehicle accident claim varies widely depending on the severity of injuries, complexity of liability issues and willingness of insurers to negotiate. Simple claims with clear liability and minor injuries can sometimes be resolved in a few months, while cases involving serious injuries, disputed fault or complicated medical needs may take a year or longer and sometimes require filing a lawsuit to secure fair compensation. Gathering complete medical documentation and negotiating in good faith are key steps that influence duration. If a lawsuit becomes necessary, the process includes discovery, depositions and pretrial motions, which extend the timeline but are often steps toward a better assessment of the claim’s value. Regular communication and realistic expectations help clients understand timing, while strategic decisions about settlement versus litigation balance the desire for prompt resolution with the goal of obtaining adequate compensation for all losses.
Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and Ahearne Law Firm assist with insurance negotiations by assembling medical records, repair estimates, income documentation and a clear chronology of the accident to present a reasoned demand for fair compensation. The firm handles insurer communications, reviews settlement offers and advises on whether an offer adequately addresses current and projected losses, helping clients avoid premature releases that could preclude later claims for ongoing medical needs. A consistent presentation of evidence improves the chance of reaching a settlement that covers documented damages. When insurers dispute liability or undervalue claims, the firm can pursue additional evidence such as witness interviews and expert opinions, and if negotiations stall, evaluate whether litigation is appropriate to protect recovery rights. Having an advocate manage the negotiation process reduces stress for injured people and allows them to focus on medical care while the claim proceeds toward the best available resolution.
Explore our injury practice areas
⚖️ All Personal Injury Services