Crane collapses cause catastrophic harm to workers and bystanders, often leading to severe physical injury, long recovery periods, and mounting financial strain. If you or a loved one was hurt in a crane accident in South Valley Stream or elsewhere in Nassau County, prompt legal attention can help protect your right to compensation for medical care, lost income, and pain and suffering. The Ahearne Law Firm PLLC represents people injured in construction and industrial incidents and can investigate the collapse, identify responsible parties, and pursue claims against insurers and negligent companies. Call (845) 986-2777 to discuss your situation and learn what steps protect your claim.
Pursuing a claim soon after a crane collapse preserves crucial evidence and helps secure witness testimony while memories remain fresh and physical conditions at the scene can still be examined. Timely action also positions an injured person to obtain medical care that documents the connection between the accident and the injuries, which is essential when presenting a claim to an insurer or in court. Early legal involvement can reduce the risk that documents are lost, that responsible parties coordinate to minimize liability, or that deadlines expire. A focused approach from the start improves the prospects for fair settlement and long-term financial stability for injured individuals and their families.
Liability refers to legal responsibility for harm caused by an accident. In a crane collapse case, liability can be assigned to those whose actions or omissions led to the collapse, such as owners who failed to maintain equipment, contractors who ignored safety standards, or manufacturers of defective parts. Legal responsibility may be based on negligence, strict liability in limited circumstances, or vicarious liability for the actions of employees. Establishing liability requires evidence that a party acted unreasonably under the circumstances and that those actions directly caused the injuries and losses being claimed.
Negligence is a legal concept describing failure to act with reasonable care under the circumstances, resulting in harm to others. In the context of crane operations, negligence might include failing to perform required inspections, allowing unqualified personnel to operate machinery, or ignoring load limits and site safety protocols. To prove negligence, a claimant generally must show that a duty of care existed, the duty was breached, the breach caused harm, and measurable damages resulted. Documentation such as maintenance records, training logs, and eyewitness accounts often plays a central role in establishing negligent conduct.
Comparative negligence is a rule used to allocate fault when more than one party bears responsibility for an accident. Under New York law, if an injured person is found partially at fault, their recoverable damages may be reduced by their percentage of fault rather than barred entirely. This means that even if the injured individual shares some responsibility, they may still obtain compensation, but the total award will be adjusted to reflect relative fault. Determining comparative negligence involves a fact-specific analysis of actions by all parties at or before the time of the incident.
The statute of limitations sets a deadline for filing a personal injury lawsuit and failing to file within that period can forfeit legal rights to seek compensation. In New York, personal injury claims are generally subject to a three-year limitation from the date of injury, though certain circumstances and claim types can alter the applicable timeframe. Because procedural rules and exceptions can be complex, preserving your claim by consulting an attorney early is important to ensure timely filing and to prevent loss of legal remedies due to missed deadlines or procedural missteps.
If it is safe to do so, document the accident scene immediately with photographs and notes that capture positions of equipment, debris, weather conditions, and any visible damage to machinery. Obtaining contact information from witnesses and securing copies of incident reports can prevent valuable testimony from being lost or altered over time. Taking these steps promptly helps create a factual record that supports a later claim and provides investigators with the information they need to evaluate causation and responsibility.
Seek and follow through with medical treatment as soon as possible after an accident, and keep detailed records of all care, tests, diagnoses, and recommendations. Maintain copies of medical bills, prescription receipts, and notes about how injuries affect daily life and work duties. This documentation demonstrates the connection between the incident and your injuries, supports damage calculations, and is often central to negotiations with insurers or presentation in court.
Prompt medical attention protects your health and establishes an early medical record that links the crash to specific injuries and any recommended treatments. Delays in treatment can make it harder to prove causation and may be used by insurers to argue that injuries are unrelated or preexisting. Being diligent about diagnosis and following recommended therapy also helps document prognosis and potential future care needs when assessing long-term damages.
When multiple parties may share responsibility for a crane collapse, such as owners, contractors, subcontractors, and equipment manufacturers, a full investigation is necessary to identify all potential sources of recovery. Handling claims against several defendants requires careful coordination of evidence, depositions, and technical analysis to establish each party’s role in the incident. A comprehensive approach helps ensure that no responsible party is overlooked and that the full scope of compensation for medical care, lost income, and long-term needs is pursued on behalf of the injured person.
In cases involving catastrophic injuries, long-term medical treatment, or permanent disability, evaluating future care needs, vocational impact, and lifetime costs is essential to seeking appropriate compensation. Addressing these complex issues often requires collaboration with medical and financial professionals to produce credible estimates of future losses. Comprehensive representation aims to capture both current expenses and foreseeable long-term needs so that settlements or verdicts reflect the true economic and non-economic impact on the injured person and their family.
When injuries are minor, liability is clear, and medical expenses are limited, a shorter, targeted negotiation with insurers may resolve the matter efficiently. In such cases, streamlined documentation and focused settlement discussions can avoid lengthy litigation and deliver timely compensation for economic losses and medical bills. The choice of approach depends on the claimant’s needs, willingness to accept a prompt resolution, and the potential for future medical issues that could change the value of the claim.
When potential damages are relatively modest and liability is straightforward, parties may agree to a limited representation arrangement focused on negotiating a fair settlement. This approach can speed recovery of compensation for immediate expenses without the time and expense of a comprehensive litigation strategy. The decision to pursue a limited or comprehensive approach should be guided by a realistic assessment of damages, the likelihood of future medical needs, and the importance of securing full and fair compensation over the long term.
On active construction sites, crane collapses can occur when assembly, placement, or load handling does not follow required safety procedures, resulting in severe injury or death to workers and passersby; prompt preservation of site conditions and witness accounts often reveals critical facts about maintenance, setup, and compliance with safety plans. Investigating these incidents requires a careful review of jobsite logs, crew assignments, and equipment condition to determine how operational choices contributed to the collapse and the resulting damages, enabling claims that seek restitution for medical expenses and other losses.
Hoisting operations can cause collapse when cables, winches, or structural components fail under load, and careful inspection of maintenance records and component histories can reveal material fatigue or inadequate servicing that contributed to failure. Identifying whether failure was caused by neglect, manufacturing defects, or improper use helps pinpoint responsible parties and supports efforts to recover compensation for the physical, financial, and emotional harms suffered by injured individuals and their families.
Crane collapses sometimes result from incorrect rigging, unbalanced loads, or miscommunication among crew members, and reconstructing the sequence of events can show how human error or inadequate training led to catastrophic outcomes. Gathering statements from site personnel and examining procedural compliance can determine whether the incident was preventable and whether those responsible should be held accountable for medical bills, lost wages, and long-term care needs.
Ahearne Law Firm PLLC focuses on helping people who have been injured in construction site incidents, including crane collapses, by providing attentive client service and thorough preparation. The firm assists with investigation, preserves critical evidence, communicates with medical providers and insurers, and develops claims that reflect the full extent of an injured person’s losses. Attorney Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and the team place priority on keeping clients informed throughout the process, addressing immediate needs, and pursuing recoveries that help cover medical care, lost income, and future rehabilitation requirements.
New York generally requires that personal injury lawsuits be filed within three years from the date of the injury, and failing to file within that period can prevent a court from considering your claim. Some exceptions and different rules can apply depending on the circumstances, such as discovery of an injury after the event or specific claims against governmental entities that require pre-suit notices and shorter timeframes. Because the applicable period and procedural requirements vary by case, it is important to act promptly to preserve legal options and evidence. Beyond filing deadlines, early action is valuable for practical reasons: evidence at a worksite can be altered or removed, witness memories fade, and insurers may begin investigations that affect claim value. Prompt consultation helps ensure that site conditions are documented, reports are secured, and any required notices to employers or public agencies are given within applicable windows. Contacting an attorney early can provide guidance on preserving your rights while you obtain necessary medical care and documentation.
Multiple parties may share responsibility for a crane collapse, and liability can include crane owners, general contractors, subcontractors, maintenance providers, rigging crews, and manufacturers of defective parts. The specific responsible parties depend on the facts of the incident, including who controlled the equipment, who performed maintenance, and whether any components failed due to manufacturing defects. Identifying all potentially liable parties is a primary task in the investigation to ensure that all sources of recovery are pursued on behalf of an injured person. Proof of responsibility often relies on documentary evidence and witness accounts such as maintenance logs, inspection records, operator qualifications, and communications among site personnel. Physical evidence and technical analysis of failed components can point to causes like lack of maintenance, improper setup, or defective parts. A thorough inquiry into employment relationships, contracts, and equipment ownership is necessary to determine who should answer for losses and how claims should be framed against responsible entities and their insurers.
Victims of crane collapses may seek compensation for economic losses including past and future medical expenses, hospital stays, surgeries, physical therapy, rehabilitation, medications, assistive devices, and out-of-pocket costs related to treatment. Economic recovery can also include reimbursement for lost wages, diminished earning capacity if the injury affects future work, and household services if the injured person can no longer perform prior duties. Compensating these measurable losses is a central part of many personal injury claims arising from crane accidents. In addition to economic damages, injured people may recover non-economic compensation for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, and other intangible harms. In cases involving permanent impairment or long-term care needs, damages may be calculated to include projected future medical needs and lifetime care costs. Where a death results from a crane collapse, family members may pursue damages through wrongful death and survival actions to address both economic and non-economic losses arising from the fatality.
Many crane collapse cases resolve through settlement because insurers and defendants often prefer to avoid the time and expense of trial, and well-documented claims can be negotiated to achieve fair compensation. Settlement discussions usually follow a thorough investigation, documentation of damages, and preparation of medical and wage records that support the claim’s value. Parties may reach an agreement after mediation or direct negotiation without the need for a jury trial if the settlement sufficiently addresses the injured person’s needs. However, if a fair settlement cannot be reached, proceeding to litigation and trial may be necessary to secure appropriate compensation. The decision to litigate depends on factors such as the strength of evidence, the willingness of insurers to negotiate in good faith, the complexity of liability issues, and whether the claimant’s long-term needs are adequately addressed by proposed offers. Preparing for litigation can strengthen settlement positions, and readiness to go to trial sometimes produces better outcomes in negotiations.
Determining fault in a crane collapse case involves reconstructing the incident through witness statements, photographic evidence, maintenance records, and technical analysis of failed components. Investigators may examine inspection logs, training and certification records for operators, rigging procedures, and communications among site personnel to see if safety protocols were followed. The combination of documentary proof and site evidence helps reveal whether negligence, improper maintenance, operator error, or defective equipment contributed to the collapse. Technical assessments by engineers and medical documentation linking injuries to the incident are often central to assigning responsibility and proving damages. These findings, coupled with testimony from witnesses and involved parties, create a factual record showing how certain actions or omissions caused harm. Establishing a clear chain of causation between the responsible conduct and the injuries claimed is necessary to support recovery from liable parties and their insurers.
If you are found partly at fault for an accident in New York, your recovery may be reduced in proportion to your percentage of fault under comparative negligence principles. This means that a factfinder could assign a portion of blame to the injured person and reduce the total damages award accordingly. For example, if the injured person is found twenty percent responsible, their recovery may be reduced by that percentage, rather than being completely barred from recovery in most cases. Effectively addressing shared fault requires careful investigation to minimize any disproportionate assignment of blame and to present evidence of how the incident unfolded. Legal representation and thorough documentation can help frame the circumstances so that responsibility is allocated fairly. Presenting clear evidence of third-party negligence and the actual causal chain often reduces the degree to which an injured person is assigned responsibility.
The time required to resolve a crane collapse injury case varies widely depending on factors such as the severity of injuries, the complexity of liability, the number of defendants, and whether the case settles or proceeds to trial. Some straightforward claims with clear liability and limited damages can be resolved within several months if insurers make reasonable offers and the injured person’s medical condition stabilizes quickly. More complex matters involving catastrophic injuries, multiple parties, or disputed liability can take a year or several years to reach resolution when litigation is required. Throughout the process, timely medical documentation and proactive evidence collection help keep a case moving. Periodic negotiation may occur as medical conditions become clearer, and preparing well for litigation can speed up settlement discussions. The overall timeline also reflects court schedules, discovery processes, and the need for technical analyses by medical and engineering professionals when those evaluations are necessary to establish causation and damages.
Paying medical bills while a claim is pending often involves coordination with health insurance, workers’ compensation if the injury occurred on the job, or other sources that cover immediate expenses. In some instances, health insurers or other payers may place liens on any settlement or judgment to recover amounts they paid, which is why documenting all sources of payment is essential. Understanding how medical bills will be handled and ensuring providers are informed about the pending claim helps manage care and financial exposure during recovery. Settlement funds are often used to reimburse outstanding medical expenses and to secure future medical needs, but the timing of payment depends on negotiation outcomes and whether a resolution is reached quickly. For injured workers, workers’ compensation may provide immediate benefits for treatment and partial wage replacement, while a separate third-party claim may pursue additional recovery for non-economic losses and damages not covered by the compensation system. Coordination among medical providers, insurers, and legal counsel helps protect access to necessary care while claims are pursued.
When a crane collapse results in death, surviving family members may have the right to file a wrongful death action to seek compensation for losses such as funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship. New York wrongful death claims have distinct legal elements and deadlines separate from ordinary personal injury claims, and filing requirements and the appropriate parties to bring suit are governed by statute. Because timing and procedural rules differ, families should seek prompt guidance to preserve their claim and understand available remedies. In addition to wrongful death claims, a survival action may be available to recover damages the decedent suffered before death, such as pain and suffering and medical expenses incurred prior to passing. These two types of claims serve different purposes and may be brought together in court. Acting quickly helps ensure evidence is preserved and that required notices and filings are completed within statutory periods, allowing families to pursue full recovery for the harms they have endured.
Representation in many personal injury cases, including crane collapse claims, is often provided on a contingency fee basis, which means legal fees are paid as a percentage of any recovery obtained rather than through hourly billing. This arrangement enables injured people to pursue claims without upfront attorney fees while aligning counsel’s interests with obtaining the best possible outcome. Clients should discuss fee arrangements, how costs and expenses are handled, and what portion of a recovery will be used to cover fees and case-related expenditures before engaging representation. In addition to attorney fees, cases may incur costs for investigations, expert analysis, medical record retrieval, and court filings. Those expenses may be advanced by counsel and repaid from any recovery, or they may be the responsibility of the client depending on the agreed terms. A clear fee agreement and open communication about anticipated costs help ensure clients understand how fees and expenses will be managed throughout the process and what to expect from the financial side of pursuing a claim.
Explore our injury practice areas
⚖️ All Personal Injury Services