Construction sites present many hazards and injuries sustained on those sites can have life changing consequences. If you were hurt on a New Dorp construction site, it is important to understand your legal options and the steps necessary to protect your rights. The Ahearne Law Firm PLLC serves clients in Richmond County and across New York, offering focused representation for personal injury matters arising from construction accidents. Attorney Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. and his team work to secure the information and evidence needed to pursue fair compensation while helping clients navigate interactions with insurers, employers, and other parties involved in an injury claim.
Having clear legal guidance after a construction accident can make a significant difference in the recovery process and in the pursuit of fair compensation. Representation helps ensure that evidence is preserved, initial medical treatment is properly documented, and communications with insurers are handled strategically to avoid undermining a claim. An experienced attorney can identify potentially liable third parties beyond an employer and pursue avenues for recovery that may supplement workers’ compensation benefits. For injured workers and visitors alike, informed legal assistance helps reduce uncertainty, protects against avoidable mistakes, and supports a more structured path toward financial and medical recovery.
Negligence is a legal concept used to describe conduct that falls below the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under similar circumstances. In construction injury matters, negligence might involve unsafe work practices, inadequate training, failure to maintain equipment, or improper site supervision. To establish negligence in a civil claim, it is usually necessary to show that a duty of care existed, that the duty was breached, and that the breach caused the injury and resulting damages. A clear record of conditions and actions at the scene is often critical to proving negligence in support of a compensation claim.
Comparative fault refers to the legal rule that allows fault to be divided among multiple parties when more than one individual or entity contributed to an accident. Under this principle, an injured party’s recovery may be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them. For instance, if a court determines that an injured worker was partially responsible for an incident, their award could be adjusted to reflect that shared responsibility. Understanding comparative fault is important because it affects the value of a claim and informs settlement strategy, negotiation posture, and decisions about whether to take a case to trial.
Workers’ compensation is a no fault insurance system that provides medical benefits and wage replacement to employees who are injured on the job, regardless of who caused the accident. While it provides important protections and timely benefits, workers’ compensation typically does not compensate for pain and suffering. In some construction injury cases there may also be potential to pursue a separate claim against a third party whose negligence caused the injury, which can provide broader recovery. Knowing how workers’ compensation interacts with other legal remedies helps injured workers make informed decisions about pursuing additional claims.
A third-party claim is a civil action brought against someone other than an injured person’s employer, when that party’s negligence contributed to the injury. Common third-party defendants in construction cases include independent contractors, equipment manufacturers, property owners, and subcontractors. A successful third-party claim can potentially recover damages not available through workers’ compensation, such as compensation for pain and suffering and full replacement of lost earning capacity. Identifying and pursuing valid third-party claims requires timely investigation to preserve evidence and establish the link between the third party’s actions and the injury.
After a construction site accident, gathering and preserving evidence at the scene can make a meaningful difference in the outcome of any claim. Take photographs of the area, equipment, and visible injuries, collect contact information for witnesses, and secure any incident reports or safety logs that reference the event. Prompt and detailed documentation helps to create a reliable record for insurers and for legal proceedings, and it supports an accurate reconstruction of what happened when liability is being assessed.
Obtaining medical care as soon as possible after an injury is important for both health and legal reasons, as contemporaneous records establish the connection between the incident and the harm suffered. Follow through with prescribed treatment and keep copies of all medical bills, test results, and provider notes to support a claim for compensation. Accurate medical documentation is central to proving the severity of injuries, the necessity of care, and anticipated future needs when negotiating with insurers or presenting a case in court.
Insurance adjusters may request statements early in the claim process, and what is said can influence the handling of a claim. It is wise to provide basic information about the incident and to avoid offering speculative explanations or admissions about the cause of the accident. Consulting legal counsel before giving recorded statements can help ensure that communications do not unintentionally weaken a claim or affect eligibility for benefits.
When injuries are severe and likely to require long term medical care, a comprehensive approach is often necessary to fully assess and pursue compensation for future needs. A detailed plan for documenting ongoing treatment, vocational impacts, and potential long term care costs is needed to present a full picture of damages. Comprehensive representation coordinates medical evidence, economic analysis, and legal strategy to seek an outcome that reflects both current and anticipated consequences of a serious injury.
Cases that involve multiple potentially liable parties require careful investigation to identify each responsible entity and to allocate fault in a way that maximizes recovery. When contractors, subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, and property owners may share responsibility, complex discovery and coordination become necessary. Comprehensive handling ensures that all avenues for recovery are explored and that claims are pursued in an orderly fashion to preserve rights against each relevant party.
For injuries that heal quickly with minimal medical intervention and limited lost time, an expedited or narrowly focused resolution may be appropriate and more cost effective. In such situations, straightforward documentation of treatment and minimal negotiation with insurers may result in fair compensation without protracted litigation. Clients often prefer a prompt resolution when the medical outlook is positive and the financial impact is limited, provided the settlement adequately addresses immediate expenses and lost wages.
When an injury is clearly covered by workers’ compensation and the benefits available meet the injured worker’s needs, pursuing only the workers’ compensation claim may be an efficient path. This approach is appropriate when there is little evidence of third-party fault or when the potential extra recovery through litigation is unlikely to justify extended legal proceedings. Even when focusing on workers’ compensation, careful documentation and follow up on treatment are important to ensure full benefit entitlement.
Falls from scaffolds, ladders, and open edges are among the most frequent and serious causes of construction site injuries, often resulting in broken bones, spinal injuries, or head trauma. Prompt investigation into safety measures, fall protection, and equipment maintenance is essential to determine liability and support a claim for compensation.
Workers and visitors can suffer significant harm when struck by falling objects, moving equipment, or collapsing materials, and when caught in machinery without proper guards. Documentation of site conditions, equipment inspections, and eyewitness reports helps identify failures that may have led to these types of injuries.
Contact with live wires, faulty equipment, or inadequate lockout procedures can cause electrocutions and severe burns with long term consequences. Medical records and safety records are central to establishing the sequence of events and potential negligence in these incidents.
Clients turn to Ahearne Law Firm PLLC in New Dorp for responsive legal representation and careful case preparation in construction injury matters. Attorney Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. emphasizes direct communication, timely investigation, and practical guidance tailored to each client’s medical and financial needs. From the earliest stages of a claim the firm works to obtain necessary records, interview witnesses, and evaluate potential liability to support effective negotiations with insurers or to prepare a case for court when a resolution cannot be reached in other ways.
Seek immediate medical attention and document the circumstances of the incident as soon as practicable. Prioritize your health and follow medical advice, obtain a copy of records and bills, and keep detailed notes about symptoms and treatment. If possible, take photographs of the scene, the equipment involved, and visible injuries, and collect contact information from witnesses and any supervising personnel. Report the injury to the site supervisor or employer and ask for a written incident report. Preserve clothing or personal protective equipment that may be relevant, and avoid giving detailed recorded statements to insurers without legal guidance. Early documentation and timely notification help protect your rights and strengthen the foundation for any compensation claim.
Yes, in many cases an injured worker can receive workers’ compensation benefits while also pursuing a claim against a third party whose negligence contributed to the accident. Workers’ compensation provides prompt medical coverage and wage replacement but typically does not cover non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. Pursuing a third-party claim can provide additional recovery when a contractor, equipment manufacturer, or property owner bears responsibility for the injury. Coordinating a workers’ compensation claim with a third-party action requires careful attention to procedural rules and lien issues that may affect recovery. Timely investigation and documentation help identify potential third-party defendants and maximize the chances of obtaining the full range of available compensation without jeopardizing workers’ compensation benefits.
New York law imposes time limits for bringing personal injury claims, and those time limits begin to run from the date of the injury or from when the injury was discovered. It is important to be aware of these deadlines early on because missing a deadline can bar the ability to pursue compensation through the courts. Prompt consultation helps ensure that necessary steps are taken to preserve a claim within applicable time frames. Certain claims involving governmental entities or specific types of defendants have additional procedural requirements and shorter notice periods. Given these variations and the potential impact on recovery, injured parties should seek guidance promptly to understand which deadlines apply to their particular situation and to take any required pre-suit actions within the required time period.
Liability in construction site injury cases can extend beyond an injured person’s employer to include subcontractors, general contractors, property owners, equipment manufacturers, maintenance providers, and other third parties whose negligence or unsafe practices contributed to the accident. Identifying the proper defendants relies on investigation into site control, maintenance responsibilities, equipment ownership, and the sequence of events that led to the injury. Each potential defendant may carry different insurance and legal exposure. A thorough inquiry into contracts, safety records, inspection reports, and witness statements is often required to determine who should be named in a claim. Prompt preservation of evidence and early legal assessment improve the likelihood of locating all responsible parties and pursuing a comprehensive recovery that addresses medical expenses, lost income, and other damages.
Important evidence after a construction accident includes photographs of the scene, equipment, and any visible injuries, incident or daily safety logs, maintenance records for machinery, witness contact information, and employer incident reports. Medical records and treatment notes are central to documenting the nature and extent of injuries, while payroll records and documentation of time missed from work help establish economic losses. Preserving clothing, tools, or personal protective equipment that may have contributed to the injury can also be valuable. Act quickly to collect and preserve this evidence because site conditions can change and records may be overwritten or discarded. Timely documentation by injured parties, witnesses, and legal representatives helps ensure that the evidence necessary to support liability and damages claims remains available for negotiation or litigation.
Insurance adjusters often contact injured parties early and may appear helpful, but casual or unprepared statements can unintentionally weaken a claim. Providing basic factual information about the incident is appropriate, but avoid offering speculative explanations, assigning blame, or agreeing to recorded statements without understanding the possible consequences. Insurers aim to limit their exposure, and misstatements can be used to minimize or deny claims. Consulting with legal counsel before providing detailed statements can help protect your claim and ensure communications with insurers do not compromise available recovery. An attorney can advise on how to respond to inquiries while preserving legal rights and ensuring that medical records and evidence are gathered appropriately to support the claim.
Damages in a construction injury case typically include past and future medical expenses, lost wages and diminished earning capacity, and compensation for pain and suffering or loss of enjoyment of life. The value of a case depends on the severity of injuries, prognosis for recovery, the degree of fault allocated to each party, and the available insurance limits. Supporting documentation such as medical records, expert opinions about future care, and economic evidence regarding lost earnings is essential to establish the appropriate measure of damages. Other factors that influence valuation include the presence of permanent impairment, the duration of recovery, and the impact of injuries on everyday activities and relationships. A careful assessment of both immediate and long term needs helps determine whether settlement offers are reasonable or if pursuing further action is warranted to address the full extent of losses.
When an injured person bears some responsibility for an accident, comparative fault rules may apply to reduce the amount of recovery in proportion to the assigned percentage of fault. The fact that someone was partially at fault does not necessarily bar recovery, but it can affect the final award. Understanding how comparative fault is evaluated in a particular case helps set realistic expectations about potential outcomes and settlement strategy. Legal assessment and careful presentation of evidence can limit the extent to which an injured person’s actions are viewed as contributing to the accident. Eyewitness testimony, site condition documentation, and expert analysis can clarify the circumstances and may influence the allocation of responsibility among all parties involved in the incident.
The time required to resolve a construction injury claim varies with the complexity of the case, the severity of injuries, the number of defendants, and whether the matter can be resolved through settlement or requires litigation. Simple claims may resolve in a matter of months if liability is clear and medical treatment has stabilized, while more complex matters involving serious injuries or disputed fault can extend over a year or longer. Case specific factors and court schedules also influence overall timing. Throughout the process, effective negotiation and thorough case preparation can shorten resolution time by addressing key issues early and focusing on settlement when appropriate. If litigation becomes necessary, the phases of discovery, depositions, and trial preparation add time, but they may also be essential to achieving a fair result when a reasonable settlement cannot be reached.
Ahearne Law Firm PLLC assists construction injury clients by conducting prompt investigations, collecting and preserving evidence, coordinating medical documentation, and communicating with insurers and opposing parties on behalf of injured individuals. Attorney Allan J. Ahearne, Jr. works to identify all potential avenues for recovery, including workers’ compensation and third-party claims, and to develop a case strategy suited to each client’s medical and financial circumstances. We prioritize clear communication and regular updates so clients understand progress and options throughout the process. The firm also helps clients evaluate settlement offers, calculate future care needs, and prepare for litigation when negotiations are insufficient to resolve the matter fairly. For residents of New Dorp and Richmond County, the practice aims to minimize the stress of legal proceedings by handling the procedural tasks and advocating for compensation that addresses both immediate expenses and long term impacts of a construction site injury.
Explore our injury practice areas
⚖️ All Personal Injury Services