If you were injured on someone else’s property in Glens Falls, you may be facing physical recovery, medical bills, lost time from work, and uncertainty about how to hold the responsible party accountable. The Ahearne Law Firm PLLC represents people injured in premises liability incidents throughout Warren County and the Hudson Valley. We can help you understand whether a property owner or manager may be liable, what kinds of evidence matter, and how New York premises laws may apply to your circumstances. Call (845) 986-2777 to discuss your situation and the steps available to protect your rights and pursue a fair outcome.
Pursuing a premises liability claim can address more than current medical bills; it can help secure compensation for future care, lost wages, and the long-term consequences of an injury. Holding a property owner or manager accountable may also encourage safer practices that protect others in the community. A thoughtful claim gathers medical evidence and documentation of the hazard to establish liability and value. Recovering damages can reduce financial stress and provide resources for rehabilitation, while resolving insurance or legal disputes that arise after an on-site injury, helping clients move forward with greater security and stability after an accident.
Duty of care refers to the legal obligation a property owner or occupier has to keep their premises reasonably safe for invited guests, customers, or others who have a lawful reason to be on the property. The scope of that duty depends on the visitor’s status and the nature of the property; for example, business invitees are generally owed a higher level of care than trespassers. Demonstrating a duty of care is an initial step in a premises claim, and it requires showing that the owner or manager had responsibility for maintenance, inspection, or security and could reasonably have prevented the hazard that caused the injury.
Comparative negligence is a legal principle that reduces a plaintiff’s recovery when the injured person bears some responsibility for their own harm. In New York, a court or jury assesses the percentage of fault attributed to each party and adjusts compensation accordingly, so even partially responsible claimants may still recover damages. Understanding how comparative negligence might apply to your case is important for evaluating settlement offers and litigation strategy, because small differences in perceived fault can materially affect the amount of recovery available after apportionment among all responsible parties.
A property owner is the individual, company, or entity that holds legal title or control over a premises and therefore may have responsibility for maintaining safe conditions. Ownership can be straightforward for a single-family residence but more complex for commercial buildings, multi-tenant properties, or leased spaces where duties may be shared between owners and tenants. Identifying the correct party or parties with maintenance or control obligations is important in premises claims because liability depends on who had the authority and responsibility to prevent or remedy the hazardous condition that led to injury.
A trip-and-fall hazard occurs when a condition on a walkway or floor creates a foreseeable risk of tripping, such as uneven surfaces, raised thresholds, torn carpeting, loose cables, or debris left in a travel path. These hazards are often preventable through routine inspection and repair, and they commonly result in injuries ranging from bruises to fractures. Documenting the exact location, dimensions, and cause of a trip-and-fall hazard, along with any maintenance or inspection records, helps establish whether the property owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition.
After an injury on someone else’s property, preserving evidence promptly can make a significant difference in demonstrating how the incident occurred and who was responsible. Take clear photographs of the hazard, your injuries, nearby conditions, and any relevant signage or lighting, and keep clothing, footwear, or damaged personal items in the condition they were in at the time of the incident. If possible, obtain contact information for witnesses and preserve any surveillance footage or incident reports that may document the event for later review and use in discussions with insurers or in legal proceedings.
Seeking medical care right away is important both for your health and for documenting the connection between the incident and your injuries, which is a central element of a premises liability claim. Even if injuries seem minor at first, some conditions worsen over time, so early evaluation ensures appropriate treatment and creates a medical record that links the injury to the event. Keep detailed records of visits, diagnoses, treatments, and recommended follow-up, and share this information with any professionals helping to evaluate insurance claims or potential legal action.
Documenting the scene thoroughly helps preserve facts that may otherwise be lost and supports a clear account of how the accident occurred. Write down the sequence of events while your memory is fresh, collect witness names and statements when possible, and note weather conditions, lighting, and any maintenance or warning signs present at the time. This contemporaneous documentation, combined with photos and medical records, creates a reliable record that can be invaluable when explaining the incident to insurers or when preparing a legal claim to seek compensation.
When an injury results in ongoing medical needs, rehabilitation, or long-term care considerations, a comprehensive approach to a premises claim is often appropriate to capture the full scope of present and future losses. Establishing future care needs, loss of earning capacity, and long-term medical expenses requires detailed evidence and, frequently, consultation with medical professionals to support projected costs. A thorough evaluation of those elements and careful negotiation can help ensure that settlement or litigation addresses both current expenses and anticipated needs over time.
Cases involving more than one potentially responsible party, such as a landlord, a management company, and a tenant, benefit from a broader approach that identifies all avenues for recovery and coordinates claims against each liable entity. Determining who had control over the premises, who was responsible for maintenance, and how liability should be apportioned often requires detailed investigation and review of leases, contracts, and maintenance histories. Addressing multiple responsible parties can increase the complexity of negotiation and discovery, but it can also improve the likelihood of securing full compensation for an injured person’s losses.
A more limited approach may be appropriate when injuries are comparatively minor and liability is undisputed, such as a clear, recent hazard causing a straightforward injury with supporting photos and witness confirmation. In such circumstances, focused negotiation with the insurance carrier and concise documentation of medical expenses and lost time can lead to a prompt resolution without extensive investigation or litigation. Choosing a streamlined path should still include careful documentation and communication, so the injured person receives fair compensation for the demonstrable losses without unnecessary delay.
When the responsible party’s insurance coverage and liability are clear, and the damages are limited and well-documented, pursuing a focused settlement negotiation can efficiently resolve the claim. This approach relies on assembling essential medical records, billing documentation, and any immediate evidence of the hazard to present a persuasive demand to insurers. While this path may avoid prolonged dispute, it still requires attention to detail to ensure the full extent of recoverable losses is considered before accepting a settlement.
Slip and fall incidents frequently occur in retail stores, restaurants, parking lots, and apartment buildings due to wet floors, spilled substances, or inadequate warning signs, and they can result in significant injuries such as fractures or soft tissue damage that require medical treatment and time away from work. Documenting the scene, identifying witnesses, and obtaining incident reports or surveillance footage when available helps establish how the condition existed and whether the property owner knew or should have known about the hazard and failed to address it in a reasonable timeframe.
Inadequate security can lead to assaults, robberies, or other third-party criminal acts that cause physical and emotional harm; property owners may face liability when a foreseeable risk was not addressed through reasonable security measures such as lighting, locks, or patrols. Establishing liability in these cases often involves showing a pattern of prior incidents, lack of reasonable safeguards, or failure to warn patrons of known risks, together with evidence connecting the inadequate security to the harm suffered by the injured person.
Unsafe structural or maintenance conditions, like faulty stairs, broken handrails, exposed wiring, or neglected walkways, can directly cause injuries when not repaired or adequately inspected by property owners or managers. Demonstrating that routine maintenance, timely repairs, or sufficient inspections would have prevented the dangerous condition helps establish how the owner’s obligations relate to the incident and supports a claim for damages resulting from the injury.
People injured on another’s property need clear guidance about the legal process, practical steps to preserve evidence, and how to document losses for a fair recovery. The Ahearne Law Firm PLLC focuses on providing responsive communication, local knowledge of Glens Falls and Warren County procedures, and careful attention to the practical details of each matter. We work to gather relevant records, explain how New York’s negligence and comparative fault rules may apply, and pursue resolution through negotiation or litigation when necessary to secure compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other injury-related needs.
Premises liability generally refers to legal responsibility that a property owner, manager, or occupier may have when unsafe conditions on the premises cause injury to a visitor. In Glens Falls, as elsewhere in New York, the key elements typically include showing that the owner owed a duty to maintain safe conditions, that a hazardous condition existed or arose due to negligence, and that the condition caused the injury. Different categories of visitors, such as invitees or licensees, can affect the scope of the duty owed, and commercial settings may involve additional standards for inspection and maintenance. Evaluating how premises liability applies in a specific situation requires looking at the precise facts, including the nature of the hazard, any warnings provided, and whether the owner or manager knew or should have known about the dangerous condition. Gathering photos, witness statements, incident reports, and maintenance records helps establish these elements. Prompt action to gather and preserve such evidence improves the ability to demonstrate how the injury occurred and who may be liable for resulting losses.
Immediately after an injury on another person’s property, your priority should be medical care to ensure your health and to create medical documentation of the injury, which is essential for any later claim. If you are able, document the scene with photographs from multiple angles, note any hazard signs or lack thereof, and retain clothing or shoes worn at the time of the incident. Collect contact information from any witnesses and request any incident reports prepared by property staff or managers; these contemporaneous records are often valuable when explaining the event to insurers or in legal proceedings. You should also preserve any relevant evidence such as surveillance footage, maintenance logs, or repair requests that might show the condition existed or was known before the accident. Refrain from giving recorded statements to insurance adjusters without first discussing the situation with a legal professional who can advise on how to protect your claim. Timely steps to protect evidence while seeking appropriate treatment help strengthen the factual basis of a premises liability case.
In New York, the statute of limitations for most personal injury claims, including many premises liability actions, is generally three years from the date of the injury, but exceptions and variations can apply depending on the circumstances and the parties involved. Missing the applicable deadline can bar recovery, which makes it important to investigate and, if appropriate, take steps such as notifying potential defendants or filing a lawsuit within the required timeframe. When the claim involves a public entity or particular contractual relationships, shorter notice periods or different filing rules may apply. Because procedural rules can affect how and when a claim must be pursued, contacting a law office early in the process helps ensure deadlines are met and evidence is preserved. Prompt consultation can identify any special notice requirements or exceptions that may affect the timing of a claim and allow for coordinated efforts to document the injury and pursue appropriate resolution before critical dates pass.
Yes. New York follows comparative fault principles, which means an injured person’s own actions can reduce the amount they recover if they are found to share responsibility for the incident. A court or jury assigns a percentage of fault to each party, and the plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by their share of responsibility. Even when some fault is attributed to the injured person, they may still recover a portion of damages, depending on the apportionment of responsibility for the accident and resulting harm. Assessing comparative fault requires a careful review of the facts, including whether reasonable precautions were taken by the injured person and how those actions contributed to the event. Preserving evidence that supports your account, documenting injuries and medical care, and presenting a clear narrative of the hazard and the property owner’s duties can help minimize the impact of any claim of shared fault when negotiating a settlement or presenting a case in court.
A variety of parties can be held responsible for dangerous conditions on a property, including landlords, property owners, building managers, maintenance companies, and, in some cases, tenants who control particular areas. Determining liability depends on who had legal control over the premises and responsibility for repairs, maintenance, inspections, and security. In commercial settings, ownership and management are sometimes separate entities, so it is important to identify the correct party or parties whose duties were breached and who can be held accountable for resulting injuries. Investigating responsibility often involves reviewing ownership documents, leases, maintenance contracts, and records of inspections or repairs to determine who had the authority and obligation to prevent or remedy the dangerous condition. Collecting such documentation and witness testimony helps clarify the chain of responsibility and supports claims against the proper defendants to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and other losses arising from the injury.
Medical records are central to supporting a premises liability claim because they establish the nature and extent of injuries and show the link between the incident and subsequent treatment. Emergency room visits, clinic notes, imaging studies, physical therapy records, and bills all create an evidentiary trail demonstrating the consequences of the injury and the reasonable costs incurred for recovery. Consistent medical documentation supports claims for past and future medical expenses, and it also aids in proving damages such as pain, suffering, and lost wages related to the injury. If you have not yet sought care, it is important to do so promptly, both for your health and to document the injury while the connection to the incident remains clear. Provide your full account of the event to treating clinicians and follow recommended treatment plans, as gaps in treatment or unexplained delays can be argued by insurers to undercut the claimed severity or causation of injuries in evaluating a claim.
Often a property owner’s liability insurance is the primary source of compensation for premises liability claims, but coverage limits and policy terms can affect the available recovery. Insurance carriers will investigate claims and may offer a settlement to resolve the matter; however, initial offers sometimes do not fully reflect the value of medical treatment, future care needs, or non-economic losses like pain and suffering. Understanding the policy limits and negotiating with insurers to reflect the full measure of documented losses is an important part of pursuing a fair resolution. In some situations, multiple insurance policies or parties may be involved, such as coverage maintained by a tenant or a separate management company, so identifying all possible sources of recovery is part of the process. Reviewing policy coverage, exclusions, and whether any umbrella or secondary policies apply helps determine the realistic avenues for compensation and how best to present claims to secure appropriate payment for losses sustained.
Helpful evidence in a premises liability case includes photographs of the hazard, the surrounding area, and your injuries; witness statements and contact information; incident or maintenance reports from the property; and surveillance footage if available. Medical records and bills that document diagnosis and treatment are also essential to show the extent and cost of the harm. Together, these items create a factual narrative of what happened, why the condition was dangerous, and how the injury affected your life, which is necessary to establish liability and calculate damages. Additional useful documentation can include repair logs, inspection records, emails or complaints made prior to the incident, and the property’s layout or signage that may bear on responsibility. When evidence is preserved and organized early, it improves the ability to negotiate effectively with insurers or prepare a compelling presentation in court, should litigation become necessary to secure fair compensation.
Yes. While surveillance footage can be persuasive evidence, a claim can still succeed without it when other forms of documentation and testimony corroborate the occurrence and effects of the incident. Photographs of the hazard, witness statements, incident reports, and consistent medical records together can establish the sequence of events and show causation and damages, particularly when footage is not available or has been lost. A careful and timely collection of alternative evidence often compensates for the absence of video documentation. That said, it is important to act quickly to request and preserve any existing surveillance or other electronic records, because such material is often overwritten or destroyed after a limited retention period. Prompt preservation requests to property owners or managers can prevent loss of potentially helpful recordings, and seeking professional assistance to identify and secure all relevant evidence increases the likelihood of a successful claim even when footage is not ultimately produced.
Comparative fault in New York means that if an injured person is found to be partly at fault for an incident, their recovery will be reduced by their percentage of fault rather than barred entirely. For example, if a jury finds a plaintiff 25 percent at fault and awards total damages of a given amount, the plaintiff’s recovery would be reduced by that 25 percent share. This rule encourages careful presentation of evidence to show how responsibility should be apportioned and highlights the importance of documenting the defendant’s actions and the hazardous condition. Understanding how comparative fault might apply to your case can influence decisions about settlement versus litigation and the strategy for presenting evidence. Showing that the hazardous condition was the predominant cause of harm and documenting reasonable steps you took to avoid the danger are practical ways to address potential claims that you were partially responsible and to protect the value of any recovery you may pursue.
Explore our injury practice areas
⚖️ All Personal Injury Services